MIN CC 09/03/1991CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "0"
474
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hodges called the meeting to order at 5:15 P.M. Mayor Hodges then recessed the Council to ad
Executive Session to consider a real estate acquisition matter: 10th Street right- of-way exchange. No othed''
items were discussed in this session and no formal action was taken.
RECONVENE IN FORMAL SESSION
Mayor Hodges reconvened the formal session at 5:30 P.M. Councilmember Gaines presented the invocation..
Mayor Hodges advised there will be no action required in this formal session as a result of the executive]
session discussions.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearing on the proposed FY 1991 -92 budget. and on the tax utility and sanitation rates
Mayor Hodges then opened the public hearing. Mr. Pipes presented the most recent amendments to the
proposed budget for 1991 -92. He said the major change is in the sanitation fund area. He said House Bill 11,
the disposal fee, added about 820,000 in sanitation fees that the city will have to pay to the State Health
Department. He said the fee was 50 cents per ton or 17 cents per compacted cubic yard. It is now the "greater
of 50 cents per ton, 50 cents per compacted, or 10 cents per uncompacted cubic yard, he said. Mr. Pipes'. '
advised it was removed from the solid waste fee bill and then somehow reappeared in the appropriations bill and,
the city staff was unaware of it. He felt because of a need to generate revenue, particularly for the State.
Health Department, this new appropriations bill was passed [Subtitle D will be signed by October 1, 1991.1
He said when it was learned on Thursday, the staff decided to adjust the budget numbers to reflect the
additional $20,000 revenue needed. He said they had projected a rate increase to 89.40 for residential units .
but found it necessary to increase it to 89.50 to pay for the effective cost of the state's increase. He said
this will be revenue for the state by virtue of the city having to pay fees to the state.
Counci Lmember Bell asked for the philosophical justification. Mr. Pipes said it is a user fee the state
can pass on to the cities so it will not have to generate it in a revenue bill for themselves. Councilmember,
Bell asked if it is to build up a toxic waste fund or recapture some Licensing fees, etc. Mr. Pipes said they
are trying to pay for the operation of the State Health Department. Mr. Poteete, Director of Public Works, said
50 percent of this goes to the State Health Department and 50 percent is used for a matching funds to perform.
the H -GAC regional plans, studies, etc; it is a fund for that purpose. Mr. Pipes said the net effect is the
staff worked Friday afternoon and Saturday morning to adjust figures, hence the agenda packet was late in being,
delivered. He said when one number is changed in a budget, it causes 25 pages in the summaries to change. He
said all the pages had to be redone and the book recompiled before the agenda packet could be sent out. He said
the agenda was posted at the appropriate time but the supporting information took more time to prepare. He said
the summary numbers have all changed to reflect the sanitation rate increase and the expenditure increase of
approximately 820,000 net from what was discussed just two weeks ago. He said the old axiom of: "Be careful'.
about your budget when the legislature is in session," has proven to be true in this case.
Mayor Hodges said this will be addressed in a separate item on the agenda. He said Mr. Pipes is
explaining this now so that we can get on with the public hearing. Mr. Pipes said as far as an overview for
the public hearing, this is the change to the numbers and the budgets since the Council's last review session.
Mayor Hodges then asked if anyone would like to make any comments or ask any questions concerning the proposed
budget. There being no one present to speak, Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing.
CITIZEN INPUTIINOUIRY SESSION
Hotel- Motel /Tourist Council Budget
Mr. Pipes advised Mr. Dave Cich, President, Chamber of Commerce, has provided information concerning::
the hotel-motel tax and the Tourist Council's budget for the Council's review.
MINUTES OF THE HUNTSVILLE
CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON THE 3RD
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1991 IN THE CITY HALL
COUNCII'
CHAMBERS, LOCATED AT 1212
AVENUE M IN THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE,
COUNTY OF WALKER, TEXAS AT 5:15 P.M.
a
The Council met in
a regular session with the following
members present:
W. H. Hodges, Mayor
city officers present:
Gary Belt
William H. Knotts, Jr.
Gene Pipes, City Manager
0. Eugene Barrett
Ronald L. Lange
Scott Bounds, City Attorney
James L. Carter
William B. Green
Ruth DeShaw, City Secretary
Ila G. Gaines
Charles Robinson
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hodges called the meeting to order at 5:15 P.M. Mayor Hodges then recessed the Council to ad
Executive Session to consider a real estate acquisition matter: 10th Street right- of-way exchange. No othed''
items were discussed in this session and no formal action was taken.
RECONVENE IN FORMAL SESSION
Mayor Hodges reconvened the formal session at 5:30 P.M. Councilmember Gaines presented the invocation..
Mayor Hodges advised there will be no action required in this formal session as a result of the executive]
session discussions.
OPEN PUBLIC HEARING
Public Hearing on the proposed FY 1991 -92 budget. and on the tax utility and sanitation rates
Mayor Hodges then opened the public hearing. Mr. Pipes presented the most recent amendments to the
proposed budget for 1991 -92. He said the major change is in the sanitation fund area. He said House Bill 11,
the disposal fee, added about 820,000 in sanitation fees that the city will have to pay to the State Health
Department. He said the fee was 50 cents per ton or 17 cents per compacted cubic yard. It is now the "greater
of 50 cents per ton, 50 cents per compacted, or 10 cents per uncompacted cubic yard, he said. Mr. Pipes'. '
advised it was removed from the solid waste fee bill and then somehow reappeared in the appropriations bill and,
the city staff was unaware of it. He felt because of a need to generate revenue, particularly for the State.
Health Department, this new appropriations bill was passed [Subtitle D will be signed by October 1, 1991.1
He said when it was learned on Thursday, the staff decided to adjust the budget numbers to reflect the
additional $20,000 revenue needed. He said they had projected a rate increase to 89.40 for residential units .
but found it necessary to increase it to 89.50 to pay for the effective cost of the state's increase. He said
this will be revenue for the state by virtue of the city having to pay fees to the state.
Counci Lmember Bell asked for the philosophical justification. Mr. Pipes said it is a user fee the state
can pass on to the cities so it will not have to generate it in a revenue bill for themselves. Councilmember,
Bell asked if it is to build up a toxic waste fund or recapture some Licensing fees, etc. Mr. Pipes said they
are trying to pay for the operation of the State Health Department. Mr. Poteete, Director of Public Works, said
50 percent of this goes to the State Health Department and 50 percent is used for a matching funds to perform.
the H -GAC regional plans, studies, etc; it is a fund for that purpose. Mr. Pipes said the net effect is the
staff worked Friday afternoon and Saturday morning to adjust figures, hence the agenda packet was late in being,
delivered. He said when one number is changed in a budget, it causes 25 pages in the summaries to change. He
said all the pages had to be redone and the book recompiled before the agenda packet could be sent out. He said
the agenda was posted at the appropriate time but the supporting information took more time to prepare. He said
the summary numbers have all changed to reflect the sanitation rate increase and the expenditure increase of
approximately 820,000 net from what was discussed just two weeks ago. He said the old axiom of: "Be careful'.
about your budget when the legislature is in session," has proven to be true in this case.
Mayor Hodges said this will be addressed in a separate item on the agenda. He said Mr. Pipes is
explaining this now so that we can get on with the public hearing. Mr. Pipes said as far as an overview for
the public hearing, this is the change to the numbers and the budgets since the Council's last review session.
Mayor Hodges then asked if anyone would like to make any comments or ask any questions concerning the proposed
budget. There being no one present to speak, Mayor Hodges closed the public hearing.
CITIZEN INPUTIINOUIRY SESSION
Hotel- Motel /Tourist Council Budget
Mr. Pipes advised Mr. Dave Cich, President, Chamber of Commerce, has provided information concerning::
the hotel-motel tax and the Tourist Council's budget for the Council's review.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "Q" 475
CONSIDER THE MINUTES
seconded the motion. Discussion: Councilmember Bell noted he has every other page of the minutes missing f
his packet and there may be others who also have this omission. There being others with the same situati
he requested delaying approval of the minutes until all of the Councilmembers have the opportunity to rev
a complete set of minutes. Mayor Hodges agreed, noting they will be approved at a Later date.
CONSIDER ORDINANCES
Consider ordinance No. 91 -20 adopting the budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92
Mr. Pipes, City Manager, presented this ordinance, the caption of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 91-20
AN ORDINANCE FINDING THAT ALL THINGS REQUISITE AND NECESSARY HAVE BEEN DONE
IN PREPARATION AND PRESENTMENT OF AN ANNUAL BUDGET; APPROVING AND ADOPTING
THE OPERATING AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE,
TEXAS, FOR THE PERIOD OCTOBER 1, 1991 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 1992; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance provides that the appropriation for the ensuing fiscal year for the operations budget shall
fixed and determined as follows:
General Fund ................ $ 7,060,355
General Debt Service Fund.... S 898,672
Water and Sewer Fund......... $ 6,034,337
Sanitation Fund ............. $ 1,860,828
' Design Engineering Fund...... $ 596.367
Total Operating Funds $16,450,559
The appropriation for the ensuing fiscal year for the capital improvement budget shall be fixed and determi
as follows:
Street Improvements......... $1,126,202
Water & Sewer Projects...... $2,802,530
Drainage Improvement Projects$ 147,121
Downtown project .............$ 238,510
Transfer to Debt Service ..... $ 173.094
Total Capital Improvements ... $4,487,457
motion. Discussion: Councilmember Green asked if, upon adopting this budget, the tax rate is set. Mr. Pipes
said it is because the city has to have a rate to implement the budget. Mayor Hodges said we have to have "a
rate" and this budget is based on $0.3844 per $100 valuation. Mr. Pipes said the numbers in the budget have
been based on $0.3844 since July. He said the tax rate ordinance is also on the agenda and the Council must
adopt a rate sufficient to fund the budget. Ms. Patricia ALLen, Director of Finance, advised this is the
expenditure portion of the budget which wiLL not change regardless of which tax rate the Council adopts. She
said if the Council adopts the effective rate ($0.39268) it will increase the unallocated reserve and if the
Council adopts the regular tax rate ($0.3844), it will result in a lower unallocated reserve. All were in favor
and the motion passed unanimously.
Consider Ordinance No. 91 -21 adopting a tax rate
Mayor Hodges then presented this ordinance, the caption of which is as follows:
' ORDINANCE NO. 91 -21
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE TAX RATE AND LEVYING TAXES FOR THE CITY OF
HUNTSVILLE FOR THE ENSUING FISCAL YEAR UPON ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY LOCATED
WITHIN AND SUBJECT TO TAXATION IN THE CITY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "O" 476
Councilmember Barrett advised he would like to see this Council adopt the same tax rate because the city is
planning to raise service fees. He said he feels comfortable with the current rate and the staff has done an I!
excellent job in preparing the budget under this tax rate (80.3844). Councilmember Barrett made the motion to
adopt Ordinance No 91 -21 adopting the $0 .3844 tax rate and Councilmember Gaines seconded the motion All were
In favor and the motion Passed unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 91 -22
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 17, WATER AND SEWERS OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS, INCREASING THE RATES FOR SEWER SERVICE
PROVIDED BY THE CITY; AND MAKING OTHER PROVISIONS AND FINDINGS RELATED
THERETO
Mr. Gene Pipes, City Manager, presented the charges for sewer: first 3,000 minimum monthly charge: $8.15; all
over 3,000 gallons, 81.60 per 1,000 gallons with a cap on that of 819.35. He said other changes concern deposit
policies. Mayor Hodges noted this ordinance also provides that a customer with no more than two jointly metered
residential units may file in advance a quarterly notice of vacancy [rather than monthly] . Counci Lmember Lange
made the motion to approve of this ordinance and Councilmember Barrett seconded the motion All were in favor
and the motion passed unanimously.
Consider Ordinance No. 91 -23 amending the sanitation rate ordinance
Mr. Pipes, City Manager, presented this ordinance, the caption of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 91 -23
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING
CHAPTER 9, GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RUBBISH, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY
OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS, INCREASING THE RATES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF
REFUSE BY THE CITY; MAKING VARIOUS FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO;
AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF
Mr. Pipes advised the 89.50 per month for single family residential pickup, as a minimum charge, is the
adjustment for that 820,000 additional expense in the residential rate. He said commercial collection
charges, landfill fees, Elkins Lake charges and rates for other out of town services are proportionately
increased based on the residential voL we to the affected customers that are in each of those categories. He
said it has been increased both in the commercial and residential areas to maintain the addition of expenses
to the appropriate user and the spacing has been maintained by adjusting all of the rates appropriate to that
increase. Councilmember Barrett made the motion to approve of Ordinance No 91 -23 and Councilmember Gaines
seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously.
Consider Ordinance No. 91 -24 amending the permit fee schedule
Mr. Gene Pipes, City Manager, presented this ordinance, the caption of which is as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 91 -24
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS, INCREASING
PERMIT FEES FOR BUILDINGS,PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL WORK; ADDING AN ADDITIONAL
FEE FOR PLAN CHECKING; AND MAKING PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO
Mr. Pipes advised these rates were discussed extensively during the budget review process. He said it has been
about ten years since these fees were adjusted. He said fees are adjusted to provide those services to the
users without having as great a subsidy from the general taxpayers for that service. Councilmember Barrett made
the motion to approve Ordinance No 91 -24 and Councilmember Gaines seconded the motion All were in favor and
the motion passed unanimously.
Summary /Analysis of net operating budgets
Mr. Pipes distributed a summary /analysis of net operating budgets. He noted the major increase was the
$338,000 increase in salaries. He said the debt service increased 8395,636.73, which is a 35 percent increase.
He said the bond issue in May was the cause of that and the increase is so dramatic, because prior to that time
the city did not have significant increases in those numbers. Combined, all of the increases and decreases
offsetting, the city has a 5.2 percent increase, including new debt service. He said if debt service is
removed, we have a total increase in all funds of 2.4 percent. He said the cast -of- living adjustment to the
pay classification system was 2 percent. He said the net operating budget increase is very, very tight.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "O" 477
Councilmember Barrett congratulated the City Manager on this because these are difficult times and
people are having a hard time paying their taxes. He felt if the city can hold its tax rate the same and have
this increase, it is a real pat on the back for our staff. Mayor Hodges agreed. Councilmember BeLL said to
amplify that somewhat, the Council also has at their place figures concerning the net increase in the city's
budget over the last ten years. He said the city has a net budget now of about 814,891,000 and in 1981 -1982,
the city had a budget of 89,513,000. He called to the Council's attention that this is about a 39 percent
increase but we have experienced an inflation rate in this country of about 37 percent. Councilmember Green
clarified that the "price index" has increased about 37 percent since 1982.
Councilmember Bell surmised that the City has gone up almost nothing over the inflation rate on the
national level, which he feels is a remarkable achievement for a city that is growing and providing more
services yet holding the tax rate and budget. Mayor Hodges said those numbers don't include an increase in
population of 11,000 people. Councilmember Bell noted this is his point, that we have provided a lot more
services and yet the city has not increased any more than simply the inflation rate. Mr. Pipes said included
in those figures also and is the two annexations that the city made during that time. He said there is always
concern when the city annexes that it cannot divide up the same level of service for the same amount of money.
He said obviously if we take inflation out and don't consider that we annexed all of the south end of Huntsville
[Spring Lake and the west side around the loop /1 -45 area] and then Fish Hatchery Road and a large part of East
Huntsville [Boettcher's MiLL, etc.] the city has provided basic services for all those areas [sewer and water3
that had not previously been served and has done this within the basic same budget framework for ten years.
Mayor Hodges felt the comments are well made.
Meadows Foundation's Inclination for Adjustment to Grant
Mr. Pipes said during the budget discussions, the Council asked if the Meadows Foundation would be
inclined to adjust the grant stipulations. He read a Letter from the Meadows Foundation which thanked the City
' for its informative letter of August 13 and stating that the amended budget proposed is certainly acceptable
to them, especially as their funds are directed toward accomplishing the facade painting and the city's funds
towards the other project components. He said they are glad to hear of the progress and local enthusiasm for
the project and they noted it sounds like a model for other communities to emuLate. He said they look forward
to receiving the final report on their grant when the physical improvements and painting are completed. Mayor
Hodges asked Ms. Linda Pease if the Meadows Foundation has been provided with photographs of progress throughout
this project. She said they have been sent a copy of each newspaper article that has been published and one
other set of photographs.
Consider Resolution No 91 -9 authorizing a grant application to the Texas Forest Service for participation in
a tree planting program
Mayor Hodges presented this resolution, the caption of which is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -9
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS,
AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE TEXAS FOREST SERVICE- -
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION TREE PLANTING GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY MANAGER TO ACT AS THE CITY'S EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE IN ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE CITY'S PARTICIPATION IN THE
TREE PLANTING GRANT PROGRAM
Mr. Pipes advised the City has identified the Bush- Miller Park as 3.664 acres and has applied to the Texas
Forest Service and SmaLL Business Administration National Tree Planting Grant Program for a total of 84,350 in
grant funds to carry out tree planting at Bush - Miller Park. He said the city is committing, as an in -kind
contribution, 83,560 to the project to plant the trees once they are acquired, for a total of 87,910. He
encouraged the Council to approve this submission so that the city can accept the funds when they are awarded.
' Councilmember BeLL made the motion to adopt Resolution No. 91 -9 and Councilmember Carter seconded the motion
ALL were in favor and the motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDER BIDS
Consider bid No. 92 -1, hvdrofluosilic acid to Harcros Chemical. Inc, in the amount of 8 .1375/lb
Mayor Hodges presented the staff's information concerning the two bids that were received for the annual
contract for the periodic purchase of hydrofluosilic acid. It was noted the staff recommends acceptance of the
lowest bid presented by Harcros Chemicals, Inc. in the amount of 8 .1375. The Council was advised that three
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK 110" 478
bids were mailed out and that last year's annual bid price was $ .1495 per pound.
the motion to annrnve of tha staff's rnrrmmuMnf inn nn rh;c wia n...l r..��...:1 �...4.e..
Discussion: CounciLmember Robinson asked about the use of this acid. Mr. Pipes said it is the fluoride put
in the water as a dental decay preventative. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously.
Consider Bid No. 92 -3. uniform rental to Aratex Services at $4.35 per man week
Mayor Hodges presented the staff's information concerning the two bids received for the annual contract
for the rental of employee uniforms. It was noted six bids mailed out and of those received, the staff
recommends the lowest bid presented by Aratex Services in the amount of 84.35 per man per week. The staff'.
advised 81.00 to 81.25 per change per man is the standard in the industry and that the city will pay S .87.x.
For the past three years, the city paid $ .73 per change per man. Councilmember Barrett made the motion tW
accept this bid as presented and CounciLmember Gaines seconded the motion Discussion: CounciLmember Bell'
asked if anyone from the community bid on this contract. Mr. J. D. Schindler, Director of Community..
Development, said Local people were involved in the process. AIL were in favor of the motion and it passed l'
unanimous Lv.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT--GENE PIPES
Consider a Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation Agreement and Resolution No 91 -10 to assume
maintenance of twenty -one traffic signals
Mr. Pipes presented a letter from Mr. Robert R. Odstrcil, P. E. Traffic Engineer, District Seventeen,
State Department of Highways and Public Transportation in Bryan concerning the inventory of the traffic signals
presently maintained and operated by the City of Huntsville that are on the State Highway System. He noted
according to their inventory, the city currently maintains seventeen stop and go signaLs, two overhead beacon
installations and two school zones. Mr. OdstrciL advised during their investigation of these signals, they
found that no electrical meters were present at the intersections of US 190 and Spur 94, SH 75 and 19th Street.
Prior to acceptance of these signals by the state, he said, electrical meters should be installed so that the '
state can be billed for the amount of electricity used. He also advised the Locks on the traffic controlLers
have been changed by the city from the standard number 2 key and he requested that the city reinstall the
standard number 2 key lock prior to state assumption of these signals.
Mr. Pipes presented the agreement which states the state wiLL assume the maintenance and operation of
the twenty -one existing traffic signals for the Council's approval, and Resolution No. 91 -10 approving the
agreement, the caption of which is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS, APPROVING
THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUNTSVILLE AND THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE
INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, EXISTENCE, USE, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
CERTAIN HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SIGNALS /ILLUMINATION AT 21 LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF
HUNTSVILLE, TO TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY UPON ITS PASSAGE
Mr. Pipes said the city has been expecting this for about one year. He said it is particularly appropriate from
a timing standpoint because Mr. Tom McBee, who has been the city's signaL maintenance man for a number of years,
wiLL be retiring soon [December or January]. He said the city will never be able to do without a sign
maintenance program, but obviously, the mechanical controllers, etc. will be turned over to the state and the
city wilt not have the responsibility for the technical aspects and mainly the expense of it [approximately.'.
84,000 savings per month in electricity costs, which will be passed on to the state]. CounciLmember Robinson
asked why the city changed the locks. Mr. Pipes said the city did change the Locks on the controllers in the
city for which it had responsibility a number of years ago because the state has locks all the same all over
the state and the city didn't want someone coming through and flipping all the signals just for convenience or
for a certain circumstance without the city being aware of it, since it was responsible for the maintenance.
He said the city will change the locks back now because any such events wiLL be the state's to maintain.
CounciLmember Robinson was concerned about signaL problems and the resultant traffic jams, and how long
it would take the state to respond concerning maintenance. Mr. Pipes said if the signals fail, the city will
switch them to flash and call the state. CounciLmember Barrett noted then the city can turn them on to flash
in the case of an emergency. Mr. Pipes said yes. CounciLmember BeLL noted this is his concern as yesterday
three signals went out and the city had them fixed almost instantaneously. He said District 17 covers a lot
of territory and fast service may be impossible. Mr. Pipes said he feels they will contract out this service'-
to private enterprise and this is a budget category that the state has committed to as far as statewide signal '.!
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "Q" 479
maintenance is concerned and they do intend to spend the money. He said the question is whether the city allows
them to spend the money for us or not. He said there will be more of a delay than usual. Mr. Poteete, Director
of Public Works, said the state already maintains the signals on Highway 75 North, I -45, and FM 1374. He said
they have maintenance personnel and support people out of Bryan. He said they have been training someone
Locally; someone that used to work for the city. Councilmember Bell asked about the equipment available for
making repairs, such as a "cherry picker." Mr. Poteete said the SDHPT already has one available.
Councilmember Barrett made the motion to approve of this agreement and Resolution No. 91-10 as presented and
Councilmember Gaines seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion passed unanimously.
CONSIDER EMPLOYEE TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENTS
Consider an employee travel and training reimbursement policy
Mr. Pipes advised there will be an appendix to the Personnel Policies to standardize the travel and
training policies of the employees. He said the general policy covers transportation, meals, lodging and other
expenses for travel reimbursement. Councilmember Barrett made the motion to approve of this policy and
Councilmember Gaines seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion Passed unanimously.
Consider a report on the Environmental Protection Agency administrative order
Mr. Pipes advised in January, the City had two extremely heavy rain periods in a short period of time
and there were a number of wash outs and bypasses that occurred at that time. He said it is the City's duty
to report all of its bypasses and spills to the state. He said in doing so, EPA has issued an administrative
order to the city for its compliance. He said city staff went to Dallas in May to meet with the EPA to discuss
the situation and to explain all of the ongoing work: the installation of the SCADA system, the repairs on the
sewer lines through the remote television work, the repairs to the infrastructure generally, the standby power
added to the lift stations, etc. indicative that the city is well ahead of any administrative order. He said
EPA has responded with four projects to complete on a time line:
' 1. Complete SCADA Monitoring System by August 31, 1991.
2. Complete construction on Gibbs Park sewer line by December 31, 1993.
3. Complete remaining repairs identified in the 1985 Randolph Report by June 30, 1994.
4. Attain compliance with permit bypass limitations by June 30, 1994.
Mr. Pipes said when the street construction work is over, more than half of the sewer system will still not have
been touched because what the city is doing today adjacent to the streets is in conjunction with the street
program. He said EPA knows the city has a lot of work to do, so they are telling the city it has to continue
with that work. He said there is also a substantial line from Gibbs Park to 11th Street that has been on
schedule for some time. He said there are some easement and access problems there, and this project will begin
very soon, noting EPA has ordered the city to complete this project by December 31, 1993. Mr. Boyd Wilder,
Director of Public Utilities, said the city plans to begin this work within two weeks. He said item number
3 above is virtually an impossibility, but a good faith effort will certainly be extended. He said the Council
needs to be aware of this order and its impact. He said the city is already doing all these things; the only
question is if the city is doing it fast enough and is it going to continue to complete the projects begun in
1986. He noted this is for the Council's information only and does not require formal action.
Consider a reauest for economic development incentive assistance from Eds West.Inc. for Drovision of utilitv
mains (water and sewer)
Mr. Pipes, City Manager, presented the request of Eds West for consideration of extension of utilities- -
water and sewer- -for an economic development incentive to the building site at approximately 1,200 feet north
on Industrial Drive as presented by Mr. B. B. Jones, Eds West, Inc. Mr. Pipes advised this request is made by
Mr. Jones pursuant to the City's development code requirement for Eds West to build a 37 foot public access
street. Mr. Jones advised Eds West will dedicate the street improvements (extension of Industrial Drive) to
the City and all necessary utility drainage easements.
The Council was advised by Mr. Pipes that in 1986, the Council set aside 8250,000 to provide service
to any industrial employer or any employer that could provide a minimum threshold number of jobs to impact the
community. The prospect the Council was dealing with at that time didn't come to fruition, however, the Council
continued each year as it went through the budget cycle to leave that 8250,000 as the city's individual effort
to attract business, industries and employers to the community to expand the tax base. He said this is the next
opportunity and Eds West has made the request. He said Mr. Glenn Isbell, Director of Engineering has done some
preliminary analyses which indicate the water and sewer costs will range from $54,480 18 inch lines] to 882,080
[12 inch lines], depending on fire protection requirement information to be furnished by Eds West's engineers.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "ga 480
He noted funding sources are available from the "Reserve for Economic Development Extension Fund," which
a balance of $250,000. Mr. Pipes said this is strictly a City Council decision.
Mayor Hodges asked what the city will receive in return. Mr. Pipes said the city will be provided an
1,100 or 1,200 foot long traffic load street that is 37 feet wide, curbed and guttered, dedicated to the City'.
which will be an extension of the city's transportation system; the city will parallel its water and sewer
system to this street. He said there is additional property behind this tract on which the city will aLsd
acquire an easement for future extensions if they are necessary and desirable. He said this will open up a
Large parcel adjacent to this and make it totally accessible by taking the right -of -way all the way to the back''
so any future development would simply have to do an extension of this Industrial Drive. He said the city wiI Lj:
receive a substantial public improvement for the city's contribution of water and sewer improvements paralle L,j
to it.
Councilmember Barrett made the motion to approve this economic development request from Eds West as
outlined above not to exceed $82,080 to be funded from the Economic Development Extension Fund and
Councilmember Gaines seconded the motion. Discussion: Councilmember Lange said he feels the Council needs a
little history on this property. He said he supports Eds Nest coming to Huntsville. However, he said, about .
ten years ago, under the subdivision ordinance of that time, a developer subdivided the property but did not
install roads and utilities, as required. He said the developer should have installed the required streets,
sewer, etc. He said the city taxpayers are now going to have to pay a portion of this. He said the alternative
of not doing this would be that Eds West would not put in the street. In which case, the city would then have
the potential nightmare of a street with only one entrance and one exit; a situation that exists in many areas:'
in Huntsville and which is very dangerous if one were ever caught in an area in which there was a disaster; with
only one entrance and exit, one could not get out. He said since we already have this situation in Huntsville
he would not want to see it repeated. He said he met with the Planning Department the evening the Location was
made public. At that time, he said, it was noted this was going to be a problem. He said he notified the '
Chamber of Commerce the next morning to advise them. He said there was no contact from Eds West to the City's.
Planning Department, so now it is coming up and the city is paying for it. He said he would be opposed to this
project because this is the third time they have come to us. He said he can understand the time frame between
the Freeport Exemption and the tax statement requests, but he believes this should have been brought to the
Council at tax abatement time. He said in regard to the funds sets aside for the city to improve the utilities,..
etc. for industries coming in, he thinks these funds should be used to construct improvements on city property .
and not for use on the private property of industries or companies. He said he hopes in the future that it can
be done this way. He said he will vote for this because if the city does not do this, it will have the
nightmare of a single access /single exit street. He stressed that his vote on this tonight, however, is not
given as an incentive for Eds West coning here.
Councilmember Carter asked what the cost would be for the road and how much is Eds West committing for
the road. Mr. Isbell said it would be approximately 8100 per foot or $120,000. Councilmember Carter asked what
other users would ultimately be possible for the water and sewer lines being discussed. Mr. Pipes said it would
be in a public street right -of -way, therefore, abutting property owners on either side would be potential users .
and any extension from the far end of the lots is possible. He said this is more true of water than it is of
sewer because it breaks over a hill at the site about 1,200 feet into the 33 acre tract, about the 20 acre mark,
and there is approximately one -third of the property beyond that. He said in terms of sewer, there would have
to be a lift station behind it to get the sewer back over the hill. He said the city will have the sewer main;,
and the manhole there built to at Least the top of the hill. He said there is some additional property
[approximately 200 acres] immediately adjacent to this that can be accessed with water and sewer lines.
Councilmember Carter said he wants more jobs to come to Huntsville. He asked what minimal threshold does this
set for this type of action to be taken. City Manager Pipes said the Council referred to a minimal threshold,'.
with the idea that there should be an equal value or some value in new jobs to offset the expense, but to his
knowledge, a number was never established.
Councilmember Carter asked how many jobs we are promised by this company locating here. Mr. Dave Cich, '
President, Chamber or Commerce, said their initial projections when they applied for bond financing and tax
abatement, was over 100 jobs in 1992 and over 450 jobs by 1996. He said they plan substantial expansion in
consolidating operations from other parts of the country. Mayor Hodges said the plants in Conroe are closing
because they are inefficient and out of space. Mr. Cich said they have 70 jobs now and the 100 jobs for the
first year will include whomever moves up or commutes from Conroe. Councilmember Carter asked who is going to
be hired; noting if we are not creating jobs for local Huntsville taxpaying residents, but instead are creating
jobs that someone else is going to move in and take, he would question whether we are gaining anything for this
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "O" 481
community. He asked what kind of guarantee we have that we are going to have Local hiring. Mr. Cich said Eds
West is already advertising locally and is working with the Texas Employment Commission to hire local residents.
Mr. Cich said existing employees will have the opportunity to move to Huntsville if they want to keep their
jobs. Mr. Cich said some of the existing employees are already Walker County residents [Huntsville and New
Waverly residents] and they are ready to begin hiring residents from the community. He said he is comfortable
they are going to be hiring a substantial number of Walker County residents. Councilmember Carter asked when
they plan to begin construction. Mr. Cich said as soon as they can get approval.
Councilmember Carter said he would Like to make a motion to delay this action until the Council can
see the kind of hiring practices this company uses before the Council votes to spend this money. Councilmember
Lange pointed out the initial construction [preliminary work] for Eds West has been done with firms from
Huntsville. He said their first step forward towards this city seems to be a good effort as they are not
bringing in people from Conroe to do their preliminary construction work but rather are seeking out Huntsville
firms. Councilmember Carter noted this helps some, but he would have voted against tax abatement had he been
at the meeting that night. He said he agrees with what Councilmember Knolls has said repeatedly. He said he
feels city after city, state after state, are being blackmailed by business corporations, leaving them looking
Like they are anti - development if they do not give away certain things in order to lure them to come to the
community. He said he reads the literature as much and as constantly as he can find it, and he has still yet
to find where the coamunity benefits. He said a recent book on the Midwest and the problems of declining
communities in the Midwest where they gave away tax abatements and incentives for businesses to come to the
community, supports his comments. He said every bit of data in that book or other books indicate the
communities did not gain. For example, he said, when jobs were created in this one particular community, what
happened was lots of people in other declining communities heard about the jobs and moved to that community,
and in fact created all kinds of social problems which created a greater demand on the services of the city
government, which in fact consumed any benefit and the jobs that were created were low wage jobs. He said he
' is for economic development, but is not sure that philosophically or in practice, what this Council is talking
about doing, achieves the goals it is talking about achieving. He said he is planning to vote against this and
is appreciative of the history presented by Councilmember Lange because that adds a little acre fuel to his
opposition. He said he understands the problem with the street outlet, but if Eds West wants to come here and
wants to be a good citizen, they should build the street, whether the city participates in the water and sewer
extensions or not. He said if the street is going to create a traffic problem, whether the city votes to spend
the money for water and sewer lines or not, Eds West can still build the street and be a good citizen by not
creating a traffic problem to which Councilmember Lange refers.
Councilmember Lange said if an easement is not granted to that particular piece of property, then they
do not have to do it and this town has a major problem. He said that area of Huntsville is going to be
developed some day because it is not just going to sit there - -this town is going to grow and is not going to
be stagnant - -and that area has major potential as an industrial area. He said if the city does not get a road
easement in there, the city will get one road into a major industrial area; it will have an industrial area like
Elkins Lake or Spring Lake. He said what would happen if one truck would have a major problem at the gate to
Elkins Lake, where would the people go; what if there was an accident at the entrance to Spring Lake - -what would
the people do? What if there were a toxic chemical spill out there, how would one get his family out of that
subdivision? He said we are talking about an industrial area here and we must have a road in there.
Councilmember Carter said there is no disagreement about the road, but he feels the business or industry should
pay for it rather than the citizens of the City of Huntsville.
Councilmember Green said he thinks the city should cooperate with this request, while agreeing and
disagreeing with some of the discussion. He said he does not feet blackmailed- -the city does not have to do
this - -it is not as if it has no option. He said he thinks this project will benefit the community overall,
noting if he didn't see that benefit, he would not vote for it. He asked Councilmember Lange if he said this
street was not being built on a public right -of -way but on a private right -of -way. Councilmember Lange said
the Eds West tract was cut out of another tract of lard. The acreage that Eds West is buying abuts the public
' road right up to it, but not through it. He said they have public access but when the property was first being
divided, there was a plat drawn up and that plat showed a road where Eds West is proposing to put this road,
but the property was sold as one tract and it was never a dedicated tract so it has not become a legal document.
Also, he said, the land has gone through a couple of owners since that time. Councilmember Green said he is
still confused as to whether the city is discussing building a water line on private property.
Councilmember Lange said when the parcel of property was originally supposed to be subdivided by the
subdivision regulations of this city, the developer was supposed to put in the roads and the utilities. He said
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "0"
482
the property was subdivided, not legally, but it was subdivided and the person who subdivided it did not do I;
those two items and now it is actually a piece of private property, so in essence, the city is putting in
something that should have been put in prior to this. Counci Lmember Green said he was under the impression they
were going to dedicate this to the city so it will then be public property. Counci Lmember Lange said the roads
were supposed to be put in prior to it becoming public property. He said the roads that should be constructed I;
and the utilities that are supposed to be constructed prior to the two dedications are not there. CounciLmember
Green said then the city is riot proposing to build these lines on private property. Councilmember Lange said
now it will be dedicated prior to that construction.
Councilmember Bell asked if the city can recapture sane of the costs of this line, via taps and making
water accessible to the other undeveloped areas around it. Mr. Pipes said yes, there is no question that as
those developments take place, the city will recoup some of its costs; obviously there is a substantial
investment in the water treatment plant and there are large capacity residuals in the sewer treatment in which
the city could stand to share some costs. He said Eds West is not going to be a major water customer, but if _
someone goes in on the other side of the street from Eds West, the water tap and water sales are sources of
revenue. Counci Lmember Carter said this seems inconsistent to him as we are going to allow Eds West to come in
and pay for their water and sewer line but if another industry canes in, they are going to have to pay their
costs. Mr. Pipes said the developer would pay for the tap fee, just as Eds West will. Councilmember Carter
asked how the city will recoup $80,000 on tap fees alone. Mr. Pipes said the city will not recoup a substantial
part of construction costs. Councilmember Barrett said the city will be receiving a nice street that costs over
$100,000. Mr. Pipes said over the last couple of years, the city has installed a tremendous portion of the 12
inch outer loop at no expense to anyone but the public. Counci Lmember Bell said it is his understanding that
Eds West is under a tight construction schedule and wishes to complete its construction by March 1. He said
he would Like to see the Council facilitate their schedule because the sooner they get here, the sooner more
jobs will be made available.
Councilmember Knotts asked Mr. Isbell what the city's costs would be on a normal sewer extension. Mr.
Isbell said the costs would be on one half of the first 300 feet and this is 1,200 feet long. Councilmember
Knotts said then the city would be talking about spending Less than $10,000 on a normal extension. He said he
can't find in the budget where the city has this $250,000. Ms. Patricia Allen, Director of Finance, advised
it is in the capital improvements budget in the available funds category. Councilmember Knotts said it is not
allocated for this purpose; it shows 8612,000 is available in unallocated funds. Ms. Allen said $250,000 of
that is for this purpose. Councilmember Knotts said there is nothing in this budget to show the Council that
there has ever been $250,000 allocated for this. City Manager Pipes said it has been in the budget every year.
Councilmember Knotts said but it is not itemized as such and there is no way for him to see that it is there
by looking at the budget. Ms. Allen said it is not a legal reserve; the Council has the option at any time ...
Councilmember Knotts said Mr. Pipes advised at the beginning of this discussion that the Council set aside
$250,000 as an incentive reserve, however, Mr. Knotts felt it was never itemized nor explained that way. Ms.
Allen said she feels it has been explained that way, it is in the available funds, it is not allocated because
the Council has never allocated any of that money, but it does have that option at any time. Councilmember
Knotts noted he sees that it is unallocated funds, but it has never been explained to him in any meeting that
the Council had $250,000 set up as an incentive package. City Manager Pipes said it has been a while since it
was mentioned, but it was discussed.
Mayor Hodges asked for a vote on the motion on the floor as underscored above. Upon a vote,
Councilmembers Knotts and Carter voted OPPOSED and the remaining Councilmembers and Mayor [Barrett. Lange.
Gaines Robinson Bell Green and Mayor Hodges] voted for the motion The motion therefore, passed by a vote
of seven to two.
Report on the exceeded Limit for change orders on the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA] System
contract
Mr. Pipes said Last fall the staff brought to the Council a change order on the SCADA system in which
it added the Rustic Pines and BrookhoLLow Lift stations to the initial bid of $99,000 to build the SCADA system. '
He said the staff also brought in conjunction a change in the communication system, because the frequency that
had been expected could not be acquired. He said Boyd Wilder went to Florida to view a similar installation
and determined there simply were no frequencies available in this area to operate the system as it was
originally envisioned. He said the total change order presented to the Council at that time was $29,000 to
combine the two projects to insure that the city received compatible equipment so it would aLL be interrelated
and coordinated properly. He said the staff determined, within the past two weeks, through obvious common sense
logic, that a $99,000 bid and a $29,000 change order did exceed the 25 percent limit for change orders under
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "g" 483
state Law. He said obviously the contractor is owed and since the project is substantially complete, the total
cost of the contract is $129,000. He said the Council approved the change order. There was no acknowledgement
of this at that time because the necessity of the change in radio communications, and the combination of it with
the BrookhoLLow and Rustic Pines Lift Stations into one overall master project, was clearly to the best
advantage to the City of Huntsville. He said this item requries no action from the Council, but he simply
wanted to make them aware this is the only instance, to his knowledge, where the staff inadvertently exceeded
the 25 percent Limit of change order limitations [in this case, on a 8100,000 contract by some four percent].
MAYOR'S ACTIVITY REPORT - -BILL HODGES
Exchange of right -of -ways on 10th Street Property
Mayor Hodges said the Council did discuss the exchange of rights -of -way on 10th Street in Executive
Session but the Council is not prepared to move forward at this time.
COUNCIL ACTION
Reserve for Economic Development Expansion Fund--Suggested Uses for Unallocated Funds
Councitmember Knotts said there were two letters in the Council's packet concerning traffic signals
[19th Street and Sam Houston; and Brazos Drive and Highway 301. He said the state does not have the money to
install the signals. He said he would rather see the city spend some money on projects like that because they
are needed for the safety of the residents. He said the city often overlooks projects like this and gives its
money away.
Drainage Concerns
CounciLmember Gaines said she is grateful the storm runoff water didn't enter her business
establishment, although it came within inches. She said this comment is made to let the Council know there is
still a problem. City Manager Pipes noted drainage is still a problem. Councilmember Knotts said an open
channel will solve that problem right down from her business.
Congratulations extended to city crew
Councilmember Barrett said the city employees [Leslie Lee, Ike Isaac and Terry Thomas] who found the
Lost articles [gold Rolex watch, billfold and keys] in the street and returned them should be commended and
congratulated. Mayor Hodges asked that this act of good citizenship be noted in the personnel files of these
employees.
Comm endations for water line work
Councilmember Green noted a constituent sought him out to tell him how pleased he was for the level
of expertise shown in the construction of the water Line on 19th Street and to compliment the staff on the way
they have worked with him in trying to preserve the trees around his house. He said it is unusual for someone
to actually seek a Councilmember in order to relay favorable comments. He said he passes this on to the staff.
Councilmember Barrett noted he has also had this experience.
Weight Limits on City Streets Needed
CounciLmember Bell said he feels time has come for the Council to set some weight limits for the city
streets. He asked that the staff look at this in the very near future and prepare an ordinance to address this
situation, particularly logging trucks on residential streets. Mr. Pipes said the staff will address this
issue. Mr. Pipes said scales are available at the landfill and trucks can be routed to the landfill for
weighing. Mayor Hodges noted city residential streets are built to different weight limit standards than state
and federal highways. Councilmember Bell noted Autumn Drive has been damaged by overweight vehicles.
Sidewalk on 19th Street
CounciLmember Bell commended the staff for resolving the sidewalk problem on 19th Street at Gibbs
Elementary School, noting it was very pleasant to see it completed before school started.
Trip to Japan
Councilmember Bell asked if the Mayor will go to Japan as a part of the sister city relationship. Mayor
Hodges advised as Mayor he has been invited, but the invitation is open to anyone in the city.
Canada Trip Reaps Consulting Work
CounciLmember Carter reported that as a result of the trip he made on behalf of the City to Canada this
year, he has been invited to do some consulting work for cities in British Columbia. He said he will be Leaving
next week to go to British Columbia to consult with Mayors from the cities of British Columbia. He thanked the
CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1991 BOOK "9" 484
Council for assisting in the funding of his earlier trip.
!i
19th Street and Avenue P 112
Councilmember Carter noted before the city did the street work, to his knowledge, there was no flooding
�f at the end of Avenue P 1/2. Councilmember Carter said he has heard from residents of that area who do not
remember going through deep water there. He said as one travels north on P 1/2, the inlet box that should be
draining that area appears to have collapsed in the middle. He said one edge of the inlet box is at Least two
to three inches Larger than the middle of the inlet box; it does not conform to the contours of the street.
He said it dips in the middle about two to three inches and felt it could not meet city standards. Mayor Hodges
asked Mr. Isbell to check on this. Mr. Isbell said the street is not yet complete with its overlay applications
and that he will look at it, noting there is a swag installation at that Location. Councilmember Carter said
he has had other complaints from George Russell about other work on that street. Councilmember Carter felt this
inlet box is not equal to the standard of work the city should be doing in the city.
Lights Highways 30. 19 & Loco 19
CounciLmember Robinson commended whomever is responsible for the installation of lighting at this
intersection. He said he saw one light and is not sure all are working, but the crew was there working about
two days later. Mr. Pipes said it was the State Department of Highways and Public Transportation and it was
their responsibility, not Gulf States, and he apologized publicly for misinforming the Council in that regard.
Councilmember Robinson noted he was also reprimanded for this misunderstanding by the District Director of GSU.
He said nonetheless, he appreciates the lights.
Bicycle and Skateboarding on Maior Thoroughfares
Councilmember Robinson advised of complaints concerning the increased incidence of bicycling and
skateboarding down 11th Street and Sam Houston Avenue. He asked if there are any ordinances which regulate
those activities. Mr. Pipes said there is no city regulation on bicycling, but there is an ordinance
prohibiting skateboarding. Mayor Hodges asked that this matter be referred to the Chief of Police. Mr. Pipes
said bicycles are permitted vehicles. Councilmember Robinson noted then the city should be able to License them
and tine them.
ADJOURNMENT
Res uUy submitted,
DeShaw, City SeW ret
September 3, 1991
n
1