Loading...
RESO CC 1975-25 - Executive Dev. and Leadership Training 75-5 J�U PROPOSAL FOR AN EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT AND LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM JI FOR THE lJ CITY OF HUNTSVILLE Proposed for funding under the provisions of Title I Higher Education Act 1965 "Community Service and Continuing Education Program" Submitted by Sam Houston State University PROPOSED PROJECT FOR FUNDING UNDER THE PROVISIONS OP 'ITUE I *HIGHER EDUCATION ACT 1965 "Community Service and Continuing Education Program" 1. Title of Program: 2. Prior Numbers) and Amounts of ;tic i Funds Granted if a Continued Project : Executive Development and Leadership Training Program N/A 3. Re uested Starting Date (First Dollar 4. Estimated Completion Dates: to be Obli_ a� ted: a. Of Project 16 ,lranua�"1977 January 15, 1976 b. Of Evaluation 31 N,arch 1977 c. Of Requirement for Support from Title I Funds S. Name $ Address of Primary Higher Ed.inst.itutzon Fed. Funds Match. Fundy Total i'unds Congressionai District A Sam Houston State University 2 ;$ 1.9325. 52 $ 12242 .72 31568 . 24 Huntsville, Texas 77340 Cooperating Institutions of Higher Education C $ $ $ D $ $ $ Total $ 2 $ 12242 .72 $ 3156_8.24_ _19325 . 5< _ _ 6. Project Director: Dr. Edwin S. Davis 7 Presentation to Advisory_Council Title: Associate Prcfessor I would prefer to present my Address: Department of Government proposal to the council (circle as Sam Houston State University appropriate) . Huntsville, Texas 77340 Se_tember 19 AM September 20 PM Telephone No. 713-295-6211, Ext. 2170 S. Within the space provide;, identify the community problem or concern toward welch this project is directed. The rapid expansion cE governmental servicesland efforts directed toward a"ncreased professionulization of staff have created problems of a super- visory nature for the municipal administrative staff of the City of Huntsville. Is the project directed oward /x Urban_ / / Suburban, or /� Rural Problems. 9. Within the space provide-. state Specific_ Objectives of this project zn measurat: e tenis. 1. Develop an understanding of the needs and priorities of the city system. 2 . Assist individual administrators evaluate their s .rehgths and plan individual continuing education programs. 3. Clarify behavior patterns expected of administ;ators . 4 . Increase knowledge of management systems and processes applicable to "developing" local governments . I _l_ 10. Within the P space rovid ;d provided.Include the project, activity, or service to be provid P Include project content , the methods and materials to be employed, the faculty resources involved, and where applicable, the frequency and duration of sessions. All activities must be designed to provide new knowledge and skills to appropriate adults which will be applied in the process of community problem solving. The proposed Executive Development and Leadership Training Program is to be an in-service educational program for the administrative staff employees of the City of Huntsville, Texas, who hold supervisory positions . The program consists of three major curriculum components dealt with across three program phases. The curriculum components include the environmental context of local government employees, management systems and processes , and personal management skills. Phase I of the program will deal with the first two curriculum components and will involve a series of teaching seminars and workshops to be held on a bimonthly basis from January, 1976 through May, 1976. Phase II will place a faculty member "in residence" in the city manager' s office for the purpose of assisting participants in the application of procedures learned in Phase I. This will also allow the faculty to gain a better appreciation of the day-to-day problems con- fronted by the administrative staff of the city. Phase III will also include a series of bimonthly seminars and workshops . This portion of the program is designed to deal with the third curriculum component and will be directed toward a strengthening of the personal management skills of the participants. Two members of the faculty of the Department of Government at Sam Houston State University will be involved in lecturing and leading the discussions during the seminars and workshops. Both faculty members are specialists in the field of public administration. They will also provide the participants with written materials during the course of the program. These materials will be collected into a coherent pack- age for future reference by the participants . Since this will be the first in-service program in which members of the city's administrative staff have participated, the evaluation conducted at the conclusion of the program should provide an adequate indication of the impact of the program. 11. List specific governmental units, or other agencies cooperating in the project. City of Huntsville, Texas -2- 12. Describe the participant population to be served. Estimate the number of particinr_nt ; 21 _ Employees of the City of Huntsville: City manager, Administrative Assistant, Department Heads, and Directors. 13. Describe geographic location encompassed by the project. Congressional districts) L_ City of Huntsville 14. Have you pursued or are you now pursuing other sources of funding for the progam? If yes, please give results and/or status. No 15. Describe evaluation procedures to be used to determine success toward achieving objectives stated in Section 9. Evaluation process will involve three steps : 1. General discussion of program and its achievements with partici- pants at last seminar session. 2. Written evaluation on prepared form submitted to faculty through the city manager 's office. .3. Reassessment of participants strengths and understanding to determine -practical impact of program. This will be conducted three months after the last session. 16. Are any publications or other product of value to other communities planned as a part of or outgrowth of the project? ( x) Yes ( ) No If yes, describe briefly. As a result of the evaluation of the program, the entire program will be redesigned where: necessary and up-dated. It will then be available to other municipalities in the area. Text materials developed will also be available. 17. Origin of proposal: / X/ Faculty / / Government Agency /% Other (Describe briefly) Who or what agencies participated in development of the proposal? (desribe briefly) This proposal was initiated cooperatively by the Department of Government at Sam iouston State University and the City Manager' s office of the City of Huntsville.- 18 If this proposal is to continue an active Title I project, please summarize achieve- ments and/or progress during the past 12 months in the space provided below: EE Not Applicable u y 6 i -4- CERTIFICATION The approved program is not related to sectarian instruction or religious worship or is not provided by a school or department of divinity. The participating institution agrees to a final audit to be conducted by the State Agency or its representative. Institutional Certification (Section VII,D) is attached (one per institution required) . Proposed Budget (with supporting detail) is attached. The primary institution agrees to complete and submit an end-of-project report as required by the U.S. Office of Education. Authorized Institutional Representative 19 August 1975 Elliott T. Bowers , President Date Typed Name and Title -5_ D. Institutional Certifications (One copy must be completed by each institution submitting proposals) k 0 On behalf of Sam Houston State University (institution) I certify to the statements marked below: I. Eligibility (all items must be checked) : 1. Has filed with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare an Assurance of Compliance with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare Regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Form HEW 441); /_/ 2. Admits as °egular students only persons having a certificate of gradua- tion from a school providing secondary education, or the recognized equivalent of such a certificate; 3. Is legally authorized within the State to provide a program of education; / X/ 4. Provides an education program for which it awards a bachelor's degree or provides not less than a two-year program which is acceptable for full credit toward such a degree; / X/ 5. Is a.public or other nonprofit institution; and /-x 6. Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or associa- tion as determined by the State Agency, or, if not so accredited, is an institution whose credits are accepted, on transfer, by not less than three institutions which are so accredited, for credit on the same basis as if transferred from an institution so accredited. 1I. The institution has determined that (1 and 2 must be checked, and if 3 is checked, either i or ii must be checked) : / X/ 1. The proposed program is not otherwise available; / X/ 2. The conduct of the program or performance of the activity or service is consistent with the institution's overall educational program and is of such a nature as is appropriate to the effective utilization of the institution's special resources and the competencies of its faculty; and / }C 3. (Check if applicable and check i or ii below as appropriate) If courses are involved, such courses are extension or continuing educa- tion courses, and: x(i) they are fully acceptable toward an academic degree; or (ii) they are of college level as determined by the institution offe:cing the courses. -1- III. Federal funds not to displace institutional funds (all items must be checked) : / }S 1. The institution will spend from non-Federal funds during the fiscal year of the proposed program for Continuing Education and Extension Programs an amount equal to or in excess of the amount spent for such purposes in fiscal year 1965; and / V 2. The institution has available all information and records necessary to support these certifications and will provide documentation to the State Agency upon request.. IV. "School of Divinity" prohibition (1 or 2 must be checked) : 1. The institution has no school or department of divinity, or 2. The institution has a school , branch, department, or other administra- tive unit which comes within the definition of "school or department of divinity" whose program is specifically for the education of students to prepare them to become ministers of religi`9n or to enter upon such other religious vocation, or to prepare them to teach theological subjects; but the community services program is not offered by that school, branch, department, or adminstrative unit, and, as in all other cases, the community services program is not related to sectarian instruction or religious worship. V. Financial Records In connection with Fiscal Procedures on any project on which a grant is received, the institution: /X7 1. Will establish an account for Community Service and Continuing Educa- tion Programs under the function "Extension and Public Service" as outlined in College and University Business Administration, Volume 1; or I /% 2. Requests a departure from this procedure and requests Coordinating Board approval of the procedure outlined in the project proposal . (Signature of Authorized Official) Elliott T. Bowers . President _ (Typed Name and Title) - 14 August 1975 (Date) -2- N N N N F N In a W N 1- O kD OD J Oh N !.J N N N � � r5 I1 CL v, o y H Cn (n O (A r) C O ro n P' rl n H t l m N• m C �i G m to 11 O G rt N O ho 4 O H m w H rl• rt ('� h m rt �r N• 'O G G w m b N It '.., F'• I 'V P rt (D (D t3 tt P. m C rt r w (D ro rt h-• ri H C7 w h CL ti rt C O 'C7 G m G O H :. fJ 7, m O m ti K P. H O ro m (t It rt M O, G P. m m w m m m �-j F'• � 'a i rt a w P. R 4 m iA O CL t1 v ri m m O O 0, O 1-1 N• o m 10 w rt N m 1A IZ m P. Z m ti m rt b m W a ,-t .• 1! m O t:1 m 'T1 P m 7 (D U o m P. CL w iC. rt m F'- 0 1.1 ti m t1 AL 'n a rt rt 1'S t1 R P. w M �l 0 m G (D "] U) m > rtrr �j ak m t3l �5 ro M 0 rt m m ro La o x o -h rt r rt w o ;r. w P. I- td [n A m r P. m m ri G cn m " M K i �� F C � m m < ,w m r I\ ro 7 tr 1 J m oa t ON rt r N •• r i w t �o O r J w1 N .n rt I ft m N 9 w m t• o m CL O N w w io 1 r I 1 o I I v+ 1 i I✓ N m Q w 1n N .a o e o 0 0 0 O 0 0 o w T N t1 1 I I I I • w IN N• o o 0 0 o r \ IC r N N o 0 0 0 0 m Ul �\ N 01 r 1� II J N• rt I y la I N P.i l0 N I V1 W W {rt I .P ,�-OJ Lq W 1 h N ' 1 F'' O O O o O O C) N h7 o N J U1 N O O O j<Cl Ct I � I to C d G H ',U t7 H Co J m Ln C�l W. N r co w m a r, r• o n �i rr rt 4 rt rt 1.' G O H CD m m (D C' H H n O Q n 0 H M n m •• S• r- O O w Y• n rt N O O �j rt m n (D F rt rt rt P. ? m ::% t1 N w m rt CL N t7 t; w w t1 "G rt (D ti rt rt rt rt N n N r (i- K h H 1-1 r- m w H w r r-3 m M h1 r• P. rt �:l r•- t3 S� N• C: o h1 7 C B o — (D v 0, G > p0L rt Cl C; O Fh rt m 0 r-�o J-h ro m G G rt La rt a G, t1 N N 'iS m rt & N• S' G rt �7 N m I N O "' m m m O CJ 1-, iL tl O 0 f. Imo• I 't7 rt H O ro a (D m z Y• w 10 G I •• ti N P. m rt r-h H M N 1-i �3 j r ty m I o N n o m m m e =5 m P. rt m x o f C t0 w r! W. "ri S C (A H h] w m w m rt (1) J 0 C1' m G a $ N• rt 4 G rt CL r o i G v E m �5 N w r P. r- 7 P. o m c hi I (D 1'1 rt G, W N (D rt O P, O M ri rt ¢j w M m :4 m m m G m m 7 m 1. r-h 1 rt m I Cq w m rt rt m m 7 x C o ! G rt o Fl- I(D G, m o C- 7 rt h7 :r LQ J• C) LQ �l If1 w IK ' ! m P. i-'• a m 11 H �m f 0 rt m +i rt ::5 rt �a N v I(D 4 m m w k o a i s D CL �i o n 1= o m G M (D w H. O r- m r rs lfkS ct (D I G, r h • Im CY fi m f0 ;• -C 1- N N rn .n �r• ti a 01 0) W N W lG is W ;(✓ N Ni C)O J I a ! f O m ul Ni n o r o o N h3 j + N Ul J Q1 O U O i U. N N In O J O CL Project Number: Budget Period: From 1/1/76 to 12/31/76 Detail in Support of Pro-.ect Budget: 1. Salaries and Wages: Salary Time Name Position/Title Rate Charged Cost Edwin S. Davis Assoc. Prof./ Per 9 mo. 3d Spring and Fall; Project Dir. 17 ,759 .00 full summer 10,498.00 Anthony K. Antwi Ass't. Prof. Per 9 mo. 3; Spring & Fall 16,803.00 4 ,328 .00 Betty Blankenship Secretary Per Hr. 10 hrs. per mo. 2. 80 336.00 TOTAL 15 ,162.00 2. Employee Benefits: Benefits for faculty 2 ,018 .00 Benefits for secretary 45.00 TOTAL 2,063.00 3. Lecturers: Name Position/Title Period of Service Cost N/A TOTAL 4. Travel: Date (s) Name Position/Title of Travel Destination Cost N/A TOTAL 5. Consumable Supplies: Item Cost Paper, stencils, general office supplies 550 .00 TOTAL 550.00 -2- Project Number: 6 . Equipment (rental, approved purchase) Item Type Contract Basis fir Claim Cost N/A TOTAL 7. Communications : N/A TOTAL 8 . Printing: Rapid Reproduction of Material for participants 500 .00 TOTAL 500 . 00 9. Other Costs : Item Basis for Claim Cost Cost of Meeting Room (City) $25.00 per meeting (Normal 375 . 00 city fee) City Employees (City) Computed on basis of salaries 6 , 505 .65 and wages per hour per in- service session TOTAL 6 , 880 . 65 -3- y :vt7Cn C7G] rnmt7rn nunnro0t7n t N H- N a P. a s rt P. rt a N :nr H- : 1 O N H. P. H- to " $ rt " ri ti tt tt • �d N P. ti I _ U) rt ri tt rt H- rt N N N • a H• N • rt - (D (D ! rt N • �C : ti • O ti ft !P rt N O a rt rn 0 1 1 0 0 yp P. rt 0 N a rt 0 M W ri- ,i � tl 0 0 W O } N t7 0 n t7 rn rt rn z 0 0 rt H- rt O H- En P. rn ro n M K ! tt (D 7 N �.. ti tt HN QGOCro00 �r 0 Hh7ya F- 0 • O r•, rt rt no �:l 'o 0 H rn H. "d 0 6 rn H. H W rt rt rt N tt H. (D (D V H• (D O r-h L' N 7 a (D H- rn H H• O 0 H• r rt rn h r 0 ro M H 0 tt a s •J tt O ID O C rn n rt tY H• H- G H• H• (D O H. r (t C 7 C N H rt N OH• C rt, d 'd 00 H00 H• Fj H. a 0 'O .� A) a n 0 O rt H• rt (D rt P. to (D CY .1 0 W N O 3 H H Dy 0 =1 W N (D tl (D z� 00 rt I-r (D (D tt 0 H- N G 0 w H. �l O a m tt, W H i rt ✓y N x N 0 Cn t7 P, Cf P, n ti O W n x Car j.. N O - C H• 0 (D rtN X' (D .. HIZ G .. a rt H- G rt C rt Ka In �J (D tl N H UI H• ri fj 10 x d H• N a ti • H•kC rt r H• rt :7 rt H 0 0 rt 0 0 rt p H I rt • ro H 0, a H• N tr x tY 0 �l (D P, tl t< t7 rt P,, (D rt -- G v (D rt N , • (D W ::, W O P• :J n N C E Lq tJC :8 Hrt rt-rCin, rt- 0y3 (D a a N �r--- 0 HW Al N -- 0 tt C W W C N y £ -. P, N tt tt C1 La N N W ., a O N 0 (D v v t7 rt CD 0 H n O N 4C .J. rs N I • H F .N H. ri I'• . rt rt rt W N � P, L�7 r� c m :500 y n H P. ,h H N r r o t N y klc. ,P tP W m U1 0 t0 01 01 J W U1 .A In UI W J N K N �3 U OOH W W 01 N t0 t0 01 O W N .n O '.n �, Un O H V1 rt °ji ro n 0 J W O WIp .P W WOO t0 tO N J m H " H ON W W N FF1 N H m ro p W rt th G N N 0 H H. rt r�. PC 4 y CLn FnS P) H N• x H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H N O rt f H tt J W W tD 00. H F" Fl W HNw 01 tp W O0 U1 U1W N N �. N N N W In Ow J OUnw W Fl Fl U1 l00 HJ W Ual to t0 F Cl (D 0 0I H -3 PiP 0. UIW W %D C) W Ot001 O0 W En 4 M O 0 0 00 0101 ,PO 00101 W NOO O N OO4P W a „ 0 th H y n a H rt a � rt rt m N H• ti iP J W UI O1 W 01 01 O1 Co 01 J W C) w 'CD CD H W W W "rJ 0 C Ut W OdP N O J 0101 O1D. W OOW O0 HOOO • a H• 01 tD J . . . . W W J .P. . J . . W JJJJJ H a N w J Nln W Nw W W Nt0 ,P NNO t0 %D -4 NNN n rtO U1 O0) 10 ONIfl tO (D -13 000 W Un W 01000 •� N N N II N H. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 01 O N O1 Ol O1 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 O1 O1 01 ON N O1 01 01 01 01 0 M H H H H H H H H H H H H H H T H H H H H H gg Ln N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . d k O 01 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 01 J J J J 11 N to II W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D N N N N N O1 U Ln H O " w w ot�n %D _.j w 01 Ul J J 110 P. In N tp (D to W N W W O O O1 W O O O O O O O O NARRATIVE Sam Houston State University is proposing an Executive Dever- ment and Leadership Training Program to be administered an conducted €€€ by the university Department of Government faculty in cooperation with the City of Huntsville. This in-service continuing education program for city supervisory employees will run from January through December, 1976 and i.s designed to improve managerial and leadership skills in an area of particular concern to city officials. The pro- gram is outlined below. INTRODUCTION: t Since the adoption of' a council-manager form of government by the City of Huntsville lest than three years ago, there has been an increased effort directed toward greater professionalization of munic- ipal staff. This effort began with the initial appointment of a city manager and has continued with strong support from the city council. As this program has developed, however, problems of a supervisory nature have arisen, which are not uncommon in rapidly expanding organ- izations. The municipal leadership now is of the opinion that an in- service education program designed to improve the supervisory skills of city employees is badly needed. The purpose of the program pro- posed here is to provide that needed in-service program. Serious budgetary constraints make it imperative that the munici- pality obtain maximum efficiency and performance. To achieve this end, directors, department heads, and the city manager must interact cooperatively with each other and with subordinates. An understanding of the problems of the whole must be understood by all individuals involved in administering city programs and services . Improved budgeting and analytic procedures must be developed and personal skills in dealing with people should be improved. x Growth in the Huntsville area has been such that the population projections for the city and its immediate planning area have been understated.l The population increase is attributed primarily to in- city migration. These newer residents tend to have different out- looks than do the natives and consequently new types of demands and a greater number of demands are being made on government structures. In order to cope with the stresses of an increasingly urbanized en- vironment, which may soon result in Huntsville' s inclusion in the Houston SMSA, municipal administrators feel it imperative that there be improved managerial and leadership skills. No programs designed to meet this need have been implemented in the past. g t i 1. See Bernard Johnson, Inc. , Huntsville, Texas : Technical Report I, August, 1971. S 4�. E } s OBJECTIVES: Learning is the critical component in executive behavior. Fail- ure to learn continuously at appropriate levels can have disastrous consequences for personal careers, and if widespread can affect or- ganizations in a like manner. only by change--a product of the learn- ing experience--can organizations render appropriate levels of ser- vice to a changing public. An important means of improving organizational performance is through the enhancement of individual management and leadership capabilities. That is the goal of the Executive Development and Leadership Training Program proposed here. When such a program is formulated jointly by practicing managers and academics who perceive a need for such training, there is good reason to believe that it is tailored to the needs of the participants . The program should, therefore, be a balance between the theoretical and the practical day-to-day needs of an ongoing government entity. The specific objectives of the proposed program are to : 1) Develop an understanding of the needs and priorities of the entire governmental system. This will not only increase understanding of one's own role and the pro- blems of others, but will reinforce the notion of in- terdependence and need for coordination and cooperation. 2) Assist individual administrators evaluate their strengths, interests, and needs to develop knowledge, skills , and programs for continuing education based upon that assessment. 3) Clarify the behavior patterns (roles) expected of administrators and further understanding of how positional roles intermesh with personal goals and behavior patterns. 4) Increase knowledge of management systems and processess applicable to "developing" local governments by devot- ing attention to the evolution of organizational theory and management practices in government, while emphasizing current trends . PROPOSED PROGRAM: The proposed program has three major curriculum components: 1) the environmental context of local government executives; 2) management systems and processes ; and 3) personal management skills . -2- These components will be dealt with across three program phases. Phase I of the program will involve a series of bimonthly sem- inars and workshops presented from January to May, 1976 . (Academic credit will be available for those participants who wish to enroll at Sam Houston State University for such credit. ) This series of nine three hour sessions will deal with curriculum components 1 and 2. Phase I is designed to permit the participants to assess their strengths and weaknesses as managers of programs and leaders. The assessment will be used to construct individualized continuing edu- cation materials. Improvement of management skills essential to all of the parti- cipants will be emphasized in the remainder of Phase I. Management by Objective and the budget as a plan reflecting tangible goals (output) chosen on the basis of rational criteria following applica- tion of simple analytic procedures will receive special attention during this phase of the program. A tentative schedule is to be found on the following page. Phase II envisions one of the faculty working in the City Mana- ger' s office during the summer months. There are several purposes to be served by having a faculty member "in residence" with the city at this time. One c:f the purposes is to assist the participants in implementing procedures learned in Phase I. The budgetary process, which begins in June, may, for example, present several opportunities for staff-faculty interaction prior to submission on the document to the city council during the first weeks of September. This will al- low consideration of the practical application of procedures learned during Phase I. Other purposes to be served by the "faculty in residence" por- tion of the program include (1) insurance that the faculty keeps in touch with the day-to-day problems of municipal administrators, (2) the opportunity to collect data and participate in experiences that may be incorporated into the seminars and workshops scheduled for Phase III, and (3) assisting the participants in the program in their continuing education efforts . Since the administrative budget process is completed at the be- ginning of September, the fall seminar-workshop series (Phase III) will initially address itself to the impact of the techniques pre- sented in Phase I on the budgetary process . Analysis of the ration- ality of the process: and its end product will be explored and the methods of overcoming problems will be discussed. The remainder of Phase III is to be directed at strengthening the personal management skills of the participants. The focus is on interrelationships between individual leadership and managerial styles and work teary effectiveness. Skills in working with others in group situations and individually are to be developed. A part of this series of seminars and workshops will be directed toward improv- ing understanding o- human motiviations. -3- r SEMINAR AND WORKSHOP SCHEDULE EXECUTIVE DIVELOPMENT AND LEADERSHIP TRAINING PROGRAM B; Month Topic PHASE I: January Seminar: Management in a Developing Urban Environment January Workshop: Individual Self-Assessment: Two Inventories February Seminar: Evaluation of Assessment Techniques February Seminar: The Leader and Organizational Behavior ' March Workshop: Leadership Models : Management by Objectives March Seminar: Program and Project Management: Goal Setting, Planning, and Resource Allo- cation April Seminar: Program and Project Management: Implementation, Tracking, and Evaluation April Workshop: The Budget as a Management Tool I May Workshop: The Budget as a Management Tool II 3 s PHASE III : September Workshop: Evaluation of the Budgetary Process I September Workshop: Evaluation of the Budgetary Process II October Seminar: Personal Management Skills : Leader- ship Styles and Skills October Seminar: Personal Management Skills : Communi- cation, Conflict Resolution, and Counseling November Workshop: The Needs of Human Beings December Seminar & Workshop: A Plan for Continuing Education and Evaluation of the Year' s Work gg t : -4- c s The final. semi:rar, scheduled for early December, will be re- served for outlininc continuing education programs which may be pur- sued by the city at minimal cost. Additionally, an open and frank evaluation of the program' s work during the year will be undertaken during the closing seminar. PROGRAM EVALUATION: ' The evaluation of the program will involve a three-step process. The first step will take place during the final seminar session, as noted above. This Fill be a general discussion of the program. Second, each participant wiJ-1 be asked to submit a formal written evaluation on a prepared form to the faculty through the city manager 's office. The third step in the evaluation process will involve a reassessment of the participants strengths and weaknesses to determine the impact of the program. This step will be undertaken three months after the conclusion of the program. Modifications in the program design will be made on the basis of the feedback and thorough evaluation prior to offering similar services to other municipalities in the Hunts- ville area. t e t -5- gg: E Sam Houston State University is proposing an Executive Development and Leadership Traininq Program to be administered and. conducted by the university' s Department of Government faculty in cooperation with the City of Huntsville. This in- service continuing education program for city supervisory employees will run from January through December, 1976 and is designed to improve managerial and leadership skills in an area of parti- cular concern to city officials. The program is outlined below. INTRODUCTION: Since the adoption of a council-manager form of government by the City of Huntsville less than three years ago, there has been an increased effort directed toward greater profes$ional- ization of municipal staff. This effort began with the initial appointment of a city manager and has continued with strong support from the city council. As this program has developed, however, problems of a supervisory nature have developed, which are not uncommon in rapidly expanding organizations. The muni- cipal leadership now is of the opinion that an in-service educa- tion program designed to improve the supervisory skills of city employees is badly needed The purpose of the program proposed here is to provide that needed in-service program. Serious budgetary constraints make it imperative that the municipality obtain maximum efficiency and performance. To achieve this end, directors, department heads, and the city manager must interact cooperatively with each other and with subordiantes. An understanding of the problems of the whole must be understood by all individuals involved in administering city programs and services. Improved budgeting and analytic procedures must be de- veloped and personal skills iu dealing with people should be im- proved. Growth in the Huntsville area has been such that the population projections for the city and its immedicate planning area have been understated.l The population increase is attributed primarily to___in-.city migration. These newer residents tend to have different outlooks than do. the natives and consequently new types of demands and a greater number of demands are being made on government structures. In order to cope with the stresses of an increasingly unbaninzed environment, which may soon result in Huntsville's in- clusion in the Houston SMSA, municipal administrators feel it im- perative that there be improved managerial and leadership skills. 1. See Bernard Johnson, Inc. , Huntsville, Texas : Technical Report I, August, 1971. JI No programs designed to meet this need have been implemented in the past. OBJECTIVES: Learning is the critical component in executive behavior. Failure to learn continuously at appropriate levels can have disastrous consequences for personal careers, and if widespread can affect organizations in a like manner. Only by change--a pro- duct of the learning experience--can organizations render appro- priate levels of service to a changing public. An important means of improving organizational performance is through the enhancement of individual management and leadership -eagabi-l-ities. . That is the goal of the Executive Development and Leadership Training Program proposed here. When such a program is formulated jointly by practicing managers and academics who perceive a need for such training, there is good reason to believe that it is tailored to the needs of the participants. The pro- gram should, therefore, be a balance between the theoretical and the pratical day-to-day needs of an ongoing government entity. The specific objectives of the proposed }grogram are to: 1) Develop an understanding of the reeds and priorities of the entire governmental system. This will not only increase understanding of one's own .role and the problems of others, but will reinforce the notion of interdependence and need for coordination and cooperation. 2) Assist individual administrators evaluate their strengths, interests, and needs to davelop knowledge, A skills, and programs for continuing education based upon that assessment. 3) Clarify the behavior patterns (roles) expected of administrators and further understanding of how positional roles intermesh with personal goals and behavior patterns. 4) Increase knowledgeTof management systems and processes applicable to "developing" local governments by devot- ing attention to the evolution of organizational theory and management practices in government, while emphasizing current trends PROPOSED PROGRAM: The proposed program has three- major cirriculum components: 1) the environmental context of local government executives; 2) management systems and processes; and 3) personal management skills. These components will be dealt with across three program phases. Phase I of the program will involve a series of bimonthly seminars and workshops presented from January to May, 1976. (Academic credit will be available for those participants who wish to enroll at Sam Houston State University for such credit. ) This series of ten three hour sessions will deal with curriculum com- ponents 1 and Z. Phase I is designed to permit the participants to assess their strenghts and weaknesses as managers of programs and leaders. The assessment will be used to construct individualized continuing education materials. Q Improvement of mar�gement skills essential to all of the par- ticipants will be emphasized in the remainder of Phase I . Manage- ment by Objective and the budget as a plan reflecting tangible goals (output) chosen on the basis of rational criteria following application of simple analytic procedures will receive special attention during this phase of the program. A. tentative schedule is to be found on the following page. Phase II envisions one of the faculty working in the City Manager' s office during the surnner months . There are several pur- poses to be served by ha"ing a faculty member "in residence" with the city at this time. One of the purposes is to assist the par- ticipants in implementing procedures learned in Phase I . The bud- getary process, which begins in June, may, for example , present several opportunities for staff-faculty interaction prior to sub- mission on the document to the city council during the first weeks of Spptember. This will allow consideration of the practical appli- cation of procedures learned during Phase I. Other purposes to be served by the "faculty in residence" portion of the program include (1) insurance that the faculty keeps in touch with the day-to-day problems of municipal administrators, FJ . 71 SEMINAR AND WORKSHOP SCHEDULE EXECUTIVE DEVELOPMENT AND LEADERSHIP PROGRAM Month Topic PHASE I : January Seminar: Management in a Developing Urban Environment January Workshop: Individual Self-Assessment: Two Inventories February Seminar: Evaluation of Assessment Techniques February Seminar: The Leader and Organizational Behavior March Workshop': Leadership Models : Management by Objectives March Seminar: Program and Project Management : Coal Setting, Planning, and Resource Allo- cation - April Seminar: Program and Project Management: Implementation, Tracking, and Eavaluation April Workshop: The Budget as a Management Tool I May Workshop: The Budget as a Management Tool II PHASE III: September Workshop: Evaluation of the Budgetary Process I September Workshop: Evaluation of the Budgetary Process II October Seminar: Personal Management Skills : Leader- ship Styles and Skills October Seminar: Personal Management Skills : Communica- tion, Conflict R°solution , and Counseling November Workshop: The Needs of Human Beings December Seminar & Workshop: A Plan for Continuing Education and Evaluation of the Year's '{Mork (2) the opportunity to collect data and participate in experiences that may be incorporated into the seminars and workshops scheduled for Phase III, and (3) assisting the participants in the program in their continuing education efforts . Since the administrative budget process is completed at the beginning of September, the fall seminar-workshop series (Phase III) will initially address itself to the impact of the tecnhiques presented in Phase I on the budgetary process. Analysis of the rationality of the process and its end product will be explored and the methods of overcoming problems will be discussed. The remainder of Phase III is to be directed at strengthening the--per-sonal management skills of the participants. The focus is on interrelationships between individual leadership and mana- garial styles and work team effectiveness . Skills in working with others in group situations and individually are to be developed. A part of this series of seminars and workshops. will be directed toward improving understanding of human motiviations. The final seminar, scheduled for early December, will be re- served for outlining continuing education programs which may be pursued by the city at minimal cost. Additionally, an open and frank evaluation of the program's work during the year will be undertaken during the closing seminar. PROGRAM TVALUATION; The evaluation of the program will involve a three-step process. The first step will take place during the final seminar session as noted above. This will be a general discussion of the program. Second, each participant will be asked to submit a formal written evaluation on a prepared form to the faculty through the city manager's office. The third step in the evaluation process will involve a reassessment of the participahts strengths and weaknesses to deter- mine the impact of the program. This step will be undertaken three months after the conclusion _of the program. Modifications in the program design will be made on the basis of the feedback and thorough evaluation prior to offering similar services to other municipal- ities in the Huntsville area.